An old lady walking down the street, children in the backyard laughing and shouting, a young man driving along the freeway on his way to work, a woman pushing her grocery cart up down the aisles of the store, a nursing baby reaching for his mother’s face, a tiny little baby no bigger than a dime dancing in her mother’s womb – all bear the image of God like a coin bears the image of a nation’s queen or king or president. This is what it means to be human, and what sets us apart from all other creatures; we are stamped with the image of our creator.
It is this very truth that makes the murder of another human being such an affront to God. It is an attack on God himself. And when that murder is of an innocent child, nestled deeply in the safest place he could be – his mother’s womb – that affront is all the more devastating because he cannot fight back and that little, tiny child is innocent. A man may murder another man in defence of his family; a convicted criminal may be executed by the state as a means of upholding justice. There is a guilt that rests upon the victim but with the victims of abortion there is no sin to condemn them with, no guilt we can lay upon their heads to justify their murder. And so, we must speak for them or we will find ourselves guilty of the sin of silence.
I have been burdened to speak up but this comes at a cost. I know women who have had abortions. I know them, not just of them. I know a man who at the age of 16 got his 14 year old girlfriend pregnant and together they sought an abortion. He knows he would have had a grown son or daughter by now. When we speak of abortion and the horrors of it – these people hear. And their guilt weighs heavily upon them.
My temptation is to avoid acknowledging or discussing abortion, excuse the action, shift the blame, plead ignorance but it is a weak attempt to save face and maintain dignity. I don’t want to humiliate someone by pointing out their sins and the guilt of silence resides within me.
But as John Stott wrote, “a full acknowledgement of human responsibility and therefore guilt, far from diminishing the dignity of human beings, actually enhances it. It presupposes that men and women, unlike the animals, are morally responsible beings, who know what they are, could be and should be, and do not make excuses for their poor performance....Sin is not only the attempt to be God; it is also refusal to be man, by shuffling off responsibility for our actions.”
Along with bearing the image of God, intrinsic to our humanity is our moral conscience that cries out to be cleared. Stott goes on to say that, “to say someone 'is not responsible for his actions' is to demean him or her as a human being. It is part of the glory of being human that we are held responsible for our actions. Then, when we also acknowledge sin and guilt, we receive God's forgiveness, enter into the joy of salvation, and so become yet more completely human and healthy. What is unhealthy is every wallowing in guilt which does not lead to confession, repentance, faith in Jesus Christ and so forgiveness."
Just as murder is an attack on the image of God, so too is our failure to accept moral responsability. And so, in defending the unborn I risk ofending another, I risk showing them thier sins, I risk exposing their shame. In an attempt to break the silence and open my mouth to speak up for those who can't speak for themselves, my words will be tinged with condemnation. But if Stott is right (and I think he is) it through this provocation of conscience that we can lead our friends to the Cross of Jesus Christ.
It is not my intention to condemn anyone for their past sin of abortion or thier present sin of silence. In conclusion, I want to echo the words of John Piper from his recent sermon on abortion, that accross anything I write is "the banner of the cross of Christ. Its color is crimson. Because the blood of Christ takes away the sin of abortion and the sin of not caring about it.”